Monday, April 21, 2008

Hillary Clinton is a Bloodthirsty Psycho

By Farol

OK, that's debatable. Still, even knowing that Clinton is in the middle of a tough campaign and will say practically anything at this point to inch up in the polls, this shocked me:

(From ABC news)
"I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president, we will attack Iran," Clinton said. "In the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them."

Even John "Bomb-Bomb-Bomb Iran" McCain hasn't, to my knowledge, said anything this baldly aggressive. Clinton isn't merely saying that "no option is off the table" (the position held by McCain and Obama, and dangerous enough in its own right). And, despite the generous framing of the ABC article ("Hillary: If Iran Attacked Israel With nukes 'We Would Be Able to Totally Obliterate Them'"), she isn't saying that an attack on Iran would be contingent upon their attacking Israel with nuclear weapons. She's saying, with terrifying certainty, that Iran WILL be attacked if she becomes president—period.

Sincere promise or cynical political move? Who knows. But here's the main point: It is now considered perfectly normal for an American presidential candidate to advocate for aggressive, unprovoked war against—and the "total obliteration" of—another country. In an even slightly less insane political landscape, a statement like this would be enough to consign a politician to the fringe. How is it any different, really, from Mahmoud Ahmadinejad saying Israel should be "wiped off the map"?

But the horrifying truth is that this call to mass murder will probably gain no more attention than Clinton's Passover address. That's where we are. Think about that.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Farol, you are obviously missing something here. Iran is an IMMINENT threat to the United States, something that Hillary understands but you don't.

They have nuclear weapons. And if they don't have nuclear weapons, they will someday, unless we step in. Iran is dangerous, an attack would be preemptive, which means it would be in self-defense. By the way, crazy liberals, that is LEGAL under the united nations charter. If you are threatened imminently by another country, you have the right to attack them.

This is the kind of threat that United States faces today, and Hillary Clinton understands that.

Go Hilldog!

Note: "Imminent threat" applies as if the United States and Israel are the same country.

Note: "Imminent threat" does not actually have to be imminent or a threat.